





![]() | Today | 228 |
![]() | Yesterday | 186 |
![]() | This week | 1529 |
![]() | Last week | 2290 |
![]() | This month | 4630 |
![]() | Last month | 6086 |
![]() | All days | 181995 |
| Other ongoing projects |
|
a) Seed dispersal The effects of the digestive process by bears on germinability and germination rate of fleshy fruits were measured in controlled experiments. Fruits from 11 species: Prunus avium , Prunus spinosa, Sambucus nigra, Rosa sp., Rubus fruticosa, Malus sylvestris, Viburnum opulus, Crataegus monogyna, Vaccinium myrtillus, Sorbus aucuparia, Frangula alnus, with seeds of different size, were collected in the field during the ripening season, given to 3 captive bears and afterwards, the seeds recovered from the faeces. For each species, we planted 100 fruits with the pulp (field treatment), 500 seeds extracted from fresh fruits (control treatment) and 500 seeds recovered from bear scats (bear treatment).
b) Foraging ecology The brown bear is a tropic generalist with a very diverse diet and complex nutritional requirements, which are influenced by many environmental and individual factors. In the age of alteration in its habitat, namely the climate warming and abundance of artificial food resources, the trophic ecology of the species is undergoing serious changes on the population and individual scale. One of the symptoms of this phenomenon is the winter activity and the intensive use of ungulate bait by some individuals. The goal of this study is to investigate some of the brown bear’s feeding habits from the individual and population point of view, to evaluate of the role of artificial food sources in the trophic ecology of the species, and to make an attempt to predict the possible impact of global changes on its biology.
c) Supplementary feeding and parasites Supplementary feeding of wild ungulates is a widespread practice in North America and Europe and significantly important in Poland. Despite the impressive scale of supplementary feeding, understanding of the ecological effects of these massive subsidies is still little and the real benefits of this practice on ungulate populations remain questioned. One of the potentially most important indirect effects of supplementary feeding is the increased risk of pathogen transmission. The increasing emergence of infectious diseases (mostly zoonoses associated with wildlife) makes this issue of severe concern worldwide. In some areas, supplementary feeding has already been pointed as an important factor in the transmission of re-emerging diseases, such as bovine brucellosis or bovine tuberculosis. The large number of animals which congregate at the feeding places, the increased rate of contact between them, and the wide range of potential host species of some pathogens make us to hypothesize that this management practice may play a key role in pathogen occurrence and transmission, also in Poland. The general goal of this project is to evaluate the impact of feeding practices on pathogen prevalence and transmission in the animal community of the Bieszczady mountains at population and individual level. We will focus on the main consumers, that’s is, three main ungulate species (the red deer Cervus elaphus, roe deer Capreoulus capreolus and wild boar Sus scrofa), and the brown bear Ursus arctos, a non-target species, but frequent user of baiting sites. |








